May 2013
10 posts
2 tags
anglosexual: misandryinhaiku: “women are weaklings!” i’m strong enough to carry your corpse to the woods this haiku is my favorite haiku
May 14th
190,690 notes
3 tags
the millennial problem:
gyzym: two millennials are barreling towards adulthood at 95 miles per hour. one of them has been coated with the most extravagant paint money can buy, but their steering apparatus is locked up until that coat’s paid off; the other’s brakes have been ripped out mid-trip, the thief yelling, “what, did you think you were entitled to these?” over their shoulder. half the tracks have been torn away...
May 11th
5,006 notes
I listened to my first hockey game on the radio today. What an awesome one to start with- Hawks shut out the Wild 5-1 and are on their way to the second round! Hell yeah!
May 10th
4 tags
May 8th
71,066 notes
1 tag
May 4th
4,540 notes
May 4th
6,743 notes
2 tags
May 4th
3,209 notes
1 tag
May 4th
32,583 notes
3 tags
May 4th
533 notes
1 tag
May 1st
2,967 notes
April 2013
20 posts
4 tags
Apr 27th
184 notes
3 tags
Listenmotif-xs: David Bowie - Golden Years
Apr 27th
17 notes
3 tags
Apr 26th
249 notes
2 tags
Apr 25th
17,205 notes
2 tags
Apr 25th
9,231 notes
1 tag
Apr 25th
47,871 notes
1 tag
Apr 25th
12,873 notes
1 tag
Apr 19th
228 notes
1 tag
Apr 19th
16,890 notes
4 tags
six variations on the theme of coming out to...
gyzym: one. You wait on it for months, run your tongue over and over your teeth while you sit across from him: in cheap-tablecloth restaurants, in low-lit bars, in his mother’s house with your hands clasped together under the table. Sometimes your knee brushes the inside of his thigh while you’re making love and the faint sound of flesh on flesh leaves you so tender that you want to laugh,...
Apr 19th
1,478 notes
3 tags
Apr 17th
785 notes
1 tag
Apr 17th
3,651 notes
2 tags
Apr 15th
56,487 notes
Apr 13th
359 notes
2 tags
Apr 12th
560 notes
1 tag
“Amid heightened speculation that a male athlete in one of North America’s four...”
– The New York Times, “National Hockey League Announces Initiative to Support Gay Athletes.” Historic.  Good for the NHL. (via inothernews) This is awesome. Way to go, NHL! (via wilwheaton) This is awesome (via videogameheart) yaaa (via erikawithac) yay hockey! :D (via aeide-thea)
Apr 11th
4,296 notes
2 tags
Apr 11th
847 notes
1 tag
Apr 10th
3,739 notes
1 tag
Apr 8th
7,573 notes
Apr 2nd
13,814 notes
March 2013
59 posts
Mar 28th
338,047 notes
1 tag
Mar 27th
2,907 notes
Mar 27th
76,969 notes
Mar 27th
50,304 notes
Hollingsworth v. Perry.
JUSTICE BREYER: Assume that you could distinguish California. Assume that we accept your argument -- or Mr. Scalia's version of your argument. And that distinguishes California. Now, let's look at California: what precisely is the way in which allowing gay couples to marry would interfere with the vision of marriage as the procreation of children, that allowing sterile couples of different sexes to marry would not? I mean, there are lots of people who get married that can't have children. So take a state that does allow adoption and say, there -- what's the justification for saying "no gay marriage"? Certainly not the one you said, is it?
COOPER: Uh, y-y-y-you --
BREYER (interjecting): Am I not clear? Look: you said that the problem is marriage, as an institution that furthers procreation --
COOPER: Yes, Your Honor.
BREYER: And the reason there was adoption. But that doesn't apply to California. So imagine I wall off California, and I'm looking just there, where you say that doesn't apply. Now, what happens to your argument -- about the institution of marriage as a tool towards procreation? Given the fact that in California too, couples that aren't gay but can't have children get married all the time?
COOPER: Yes, Your Honor. The concern is that redefining marriage as a genderless institution will sever its abiding connection to its historic, traditional procreative purposes. And it will re-focus, re-focus the purpose of marriage a-and the definition of marriage away from the, uh, uh, raising of children and to the emotional needs and desires of adults, of adult couples.
(Crosstalk.)
KAGAN: Well, suppose a State said, "Because we think that the focus of marriage really should be on procreation, we're not going to give marriage licenses any more to any couple where both people are over the age of 55." Would that be constitutional?
COOPER: No, Your Honor. It would not be constitutional.
KAGAN: Because that's the same State interest, I would think. You know? If you're over the age of 55, you don't help us serve the government's interest in protecting procreation through marriage. So why is that different?
COOPER: You, you, Your Honor, even with respect to couples over the age of 55, it is very rare that both couples -- both parties to the couple -- are infertile.
(Laughter from the gallery.)
KAGAN (interjecting): No really, because the couple -- I can just assure you if both the woman and the man are over the age of 55, there are not a lot of children coming out of that marriage.
(More laughter.)
Mar 27th
1,093 notes
Mar 26th
9,173 notes
2 tags
Mar 26th
5,283 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
30,672 notes
1 tag
the frightening truth about desire
spellcoats: it’s on but i don’t know whether i want to be her, fuck her or borrow her clothes. — daphne gottlieb
Mar 26th
599 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
4,574 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
59,959 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
154,633 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
1,030 notes
3 tags
Mar 26th
1,515 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
63,647 notes
2 tags
Mar 26th
127,896 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
2,206 notes
2 tags
Mar 26th
17,065 notes
Mar 26th
1,649 notes
1 tag
Mar 26th
12,701 notes